They either cannot afford it, or they don't understand it, maybe both.I don’t know why a lot of people are hating on the ZX4RR.
CC Phobia, spec sheet warriors, and highway heroes. I think it also depends on location. However, it's reasonable to say that the 4RR is a little on the high side of pricing. Other than that, it's a solid bike.I don’t know why a lot of people are hating on the ZX4RR.
Good find - thanks !
You are spot on. Wish I still had my place outside of Newport, TN and I’d just leave this bike up there.I live in the mountains of East Tennessee and this bike will be perfect for the mountain roads!
Living in WNC, I can reach ETN in half an hour.You are spot on. Wish I still had my place outside of Newport, TN and I’d just leave this bike up there.
I am in the camp of not understanding it I guess. I was hoping it would be significantly cheaper for a fun canyon carver. I currently own a 636 full track bike, R1M and S1KRR.They either cannot afford it, or they don't understand it, maybe both.
For what is jammed into the machine you get plenty to justify the cost. The value proposition is better in Canada this time around, and that's before you consider the 4R being available here as well.
Niche bike, but it's the only one in it's class kinda deal that isn't old or imported.
I wouldn't bother with the 4R if I had the bikes you do, truthfully. For you I doubt it would make sense to pick one up at any price.I am in the camp of not understanding it I guess. I was hoping it would be significantly cheaper for a fun canyon carver. I currently own a 636 full track bike, R1M and S1KRR.
I suppose but I feel my liter bikes are too much for the twisties in my area. My 636 is a blast but I am always nervous about getting caught with a track bike on the road. The 4RR seems like a bike I can push hard and have a lot of fun. If the stock weight was significantly lower than the 600 class, the price would be much more justified.I wouldn't bother with the 4R if I had the bikes you do, truthfully. For you I doubt it would make sense to pick one up at any price.
A smaller top level sportbike cannot be much cheaper that an open class sportbike, just because it has a lesser displacement. If Kawasaki had not cut some corners with things like the steel frame and swingarm, it would have been lighter, but more expensive. The margins are smaller on the smaller bikes already without trying to make it much less expensive.I am in the camp of not understanding it I guess. I was hoping it would be significantly cheaper for a fun canyon carver. I currently own a 636 full track bike, R1M and S1KRR.
Completely understandable. I used to have a KTM 1290 Super Duke but traded it in for two 390 KTMs - an RC390 for me, and a Duke 390 for my wife.I suppose but I feel my liter bikes are too much for the twisties in my area...